Ein Blog über Religion und Politik

Wer an den britischen Riots schuld ist

Von 9. August 2011 um 19:00 Uhr

Katharine Birbalsingh sagt in ihrem Blog alles Nötige über die Riots und die Verantwortung der Täter (und ihrer Eltern):

Many of these mindless thugs involved in the riots don’t think more than 10 minutes into the future. They think that stealing trainers is ‘fun’, not even considering that it might be wrong. Many of them are, quite literally, unable to read and write: 17 percent of 15-year-olds are functionally illiterate. If you de-educate an entire generation, if you constantly make excuses for their behaviour, if you never teach them the difference between right and wrong, then chaos is what you reap. These young people are just implementing what they’ve learnt at school!

Teachers can only keep the peace in the classroom because they have established authority. Where there is order in classrooms, children show respect because they have been taught to respect teachers. ONE teacher can therefore command the respect of hundreds of children. It is the same with the police and order in society. The police cannot hope to outnumber the rioters. As a civilised society, we rely on a sense of morality in our people to keep the order. How did the Japanese survive their recent nuclear disaster? They queued quietly for food and help, and waited. They didn’t say ‘ME ME ME’! Do young people wear hoodies in Japan? Do Japanese children question their teacher’s authority? Do Japanese adults defend the appalling behaviour of their youth? NO.

We are an international disgrace. What would happen if the teacher left her classroom and said that she was ‘keeping a close eye on things from her holiday home’? Theresa May, Home Secretary, was the only one of our leaders, whether Conservative or Labour, who returned from holiday immediately when Tottenham exploded. Where were all of our leaders? If even our politicians refuse to take responsibility for their ‘classrooms’, then how can we expect the children to remain in their chairs?

Ken Livingstone blames everything from Thatcher to the Conservatives to lack of youth clubs. Darcus Howe is comparing our riots to Syria’s! I look on in horror at our BBC reporters, as well as ordinary people being interviewed on TV, as they all chant the usual mantra without even thinking: cuts, cuts, cuts. A man whose shop had been looted met Nick Clegg on the street, clearly distressed, and rather than blame the looters, he attacked the Deputy Prime Minister over the cuts. What is wrong with everyone? Have we been brainwashed by aliens?

Even the sensible people (and there have been a few) refuse to denounce ALL of the violence. Brixton, Croydon, Birmingham are bad, but Tottenham somehow was ‘understandable’. Come again? You mean sometimes looting and violence are acceptable? Apparently, the Tottenham riots are understandable because the police shot Mark Duggan (father of four, according to the Guardian). Do we really think that the police went out and killed a random innocent man? Or rather, as the local residents say, was he not a ‘major player’ in the Tottenham criminal underworld? They say he ‘lived by the gun’, and caused ‘grief’ to local people. Some say he was a crack cocaine dealer. His fiancée says he was determined not to go back to jail (so he has been in jail) and he has a child with her and another woman. She also has another 2 children from another man. Yet what do Mark Duggan’s parents say? That he was a good father and a respected member of the local community. How can someone with that reputation be considered a respected member of the local community?

Was Mark Duggan a good father? Who knows! Certainly, Jens Breivik, father of the Norway bomber, was absent during his son’s childhood. He refused to see his 16-year-old son because he ‘wasn’t ready’ (whatever that means). Jens Breivik, rather than feeling remorse for having failed as a father, was only interested in his own reputation when the appalling Norway killings took place. But when I criticised him, I was shot down by ordinary readers of this blog. How dare I criticise parents when I am not a parent myself! White readers say that they are unable to speak about black absent fathers because they’re white. Fine. But is Jens Breivik black? Yet no one was willing to be critical of his questionable parenting. Parents teach their children the difference between right and wrong. If they are absent, then the child grows up without a moral compass.

These criminals are responsible for their behaviour but so are their parents who sit at home, knowing their children are out there, looking forward to the goodies their children will bring home. I am so angry, so ashamed, so utterly dismayed. The vast majority of these criminals are black. No one will say it. I hang my head in shame, both as a black person and as a teacher. I naively thought if I could tell people what was happening in our schools that we would change things. I wrote a book, thinking that this would stop the liberals from the excuse-making. But instead, I was told I had made it all up. Our great capital city is on fire and even this isn’t enough to convince people that the excuse-making must stop!

What does the Socialist Workers Party say? “These riots are a bitter reaction to racist policing and a Tory Government destroying people’s lives.” It beggars belief. Our reaction to these riots is the greatest worry. What will defeat us is not the rioters. Scary as they are, they are a minority of yobs. What will defeat us is the power of bad ideas. Given our refusal to change, the worst is yet to come.

Kategorien: Debatte, Wer sind wir?
Leser-Kommentare
  1. 1.

    Hier das Interview mit Darcus Howe, der von einem Aufstand, insurrection, spricht und mit London mit Syrien vergleicht.

    h t t p://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biJgILxGK0o

    Unter der Überschrift:

    Good on elder Brother Darcus Howe for putting this stupid BBC presenter in her place

    ist das Video auch auf der Plünderer-Versteherseite

    h t t p://sonsofmalcolm.blogspot.com/

    gepostet.

    • 9. August 2011 um 19:29 Uhr
    • Thomas Holm
  2. 2.

    Also pardon, aber was ist das für ein wirres Geschreibsel?

    Die Japaner tragen keine Kapuzen und respektieren brav ihre Eltern, vermutlich machen ihre “Führer” auch keinen Urlaub. Die Eltern bedanken sich, indem sie den Kindern den Unterschied zwischen gut und böse beibringen. Was wiederum dazu führt, dass sowohl Breivik als auch die englischen riot kids keine Japaner sind. Hurra! Also für Japan jetzt. Für England sieht es derweil düster aus, bei solchen Eltern und solchen Kindern. Saftige Gefängnisstrafen, Härte und Entschlossenheit hat Herr Lau ja schon gefordert, aber da ist noch Luft nach oben. Knastet doch einfach auch die Eltern ein, damit ist das Problem dann von der Straße verschwunden, d.h. in Ihrer Welt: Gelöst!

    Mein moralischer Kompass macht swooosh.

    • 9. August 2011 um 21:25 Uhr
    • Thomas
  3. 3.

    Es liegt mir fern, Cameron politisch zu rechtfertigen.
    Aber er hat völlig recht, wie o.a. Autorin, wenn er sagt, daß wer alt genug ist, diese Verbrechen zu begehen, auch alt genug ist, dafür bestraft zu werden.

    Wer nie gelernt hat, daß soziale Regeln ein Ausdruck von Respekt der Ordnung zum Wohle aller ist, sucht seine Grenze. Wenn er sie nicht bekommt, wird er immer aggressiver. Egal gegen wen oder was. Er bewertet Toleranz gegenüber seiner Aggressivität als ermunternde Schwäche.

    Diese Leute haben, egal welcher Nationalität, eine Störung im moralischen Welt- und Wertebild, dessen gelingendes Zustandekommen eine anspruchsvolle pädagogische Aufgabe ist.

    Zur unkonventionellen Freiheit im Denken und Handeln ist nur Fähig, wer Selbstdisziplin und Respekt, d.h. konventionelle Regeln, gelernt hat.

  4. 4.

    Na, Cameron hat ja nun die harte Hand angekündigt.
    Ich denke, damit werden diesen Chaoten schon Anstand und Disziplin
    beigebracht. Auf das sie ihre lächerlichen sozialen Problemchen nicht als Vorwand nehmen.

    (Hab ich den Wettbewerb im Kurzstreckendenken jetzt gewonnen?)

    • 10. August 2011 um 00:37 Uhr
    • Christian
  5. 5.

    Nein, den im hohlen Sarkasmus.

    • 10. August 2011 um 00:41 Uhr
    • N. Neumann
  6. 6.

    Missa brävis

    “Gähn”

    • 10. August 2011 um 00:42 Uhr
    • Cem Gülay
  7. 7.

    >How can someone with that reputation be considered a respected member of the local community?

    Meint die Dame das ernst?

    Vielleicht sollte sie sich mal einen Mafia-Film ansehen.

    Wer in diesen Gegenden aufwächst, lebt nach anderen Regeln.

    • 10. August 2011 um 01:11 Uhr
    • PBUH
  8. 8.

    3.000.000 Klicks !

    • 10. August 2011 um 01:15 Uhr
    • PBUH
  9. Kommentar zum Thema

    (erforderlich)

    (wird nicht veröffentlicht) (erforderlich)

    (erforderlich)